How They Manipulate the Policy Window While We’re Distracted
- Catherine Guillaume-Sackey
- Mar 6
- 3 min read

Let’s talk about how policies actually get made and why it’s so easy for those in power to manipulate the public into demanding changes that don’t actually serve them.
Public policy doesn’t just happen overnight. It follows a process where different streams—problems, solutions, and politics—align at the right time to create what’s called a policy window, an opportunity for major change. Sometimes, these windows open naturally due to real crises. Other times, they are manufactured by inflating fear, controlling narratives, and manipulating public perception.
Policy Window
• Webster’s: A period when conditions are favorable for a particular policy change due to shifts in public opinion, political climate, or new evidence.
• Urban: When the government finally pays attention to a problem—but only because it benefits them or their people.
Take the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) of 2015, for example. On the surface, it was an education bill that gave more control to states. But behind the scenes, it carried policies tied to energy reform, land use, prison funding, health, and insurance. This is common—big bills often become vehicles for unrelated policies, passed while the public is focused on just one aspect.
Agenda-Setting
• Webster’s: The process by which policymakers and media determine which issues receive public attention and legislative action.
• Urban: When the government picks what you’re going to care about this week.
This is how agenda-setting works. Power players don’t just wait for problems; they manufacture urgency to speed up the process. As John Kingdon explains,
“A policy proposal is linked to an urgent issue that needs fixing… proposals that coincide with the political event in question rise to the forefront and benefit from the favorable political atmosphere.”
And we’ve seen this game before. They spun the block, flipping BLM into “All Lives Matter”, not because they cared about unity, but because they saw how easy it was to divide and dilute movements.
Manufactured Crisis
• Webster’s: A situation deliberately exaggerated or fabricated to justify political action.
• Urban: When politicians gaslight the whole country into believing something is a crisis so they can make money off it.
They took notes on how people responded to economic pressure and then created a Temu prototype, encouraging reckless spending while keeping people financially unstable.
Conspicuous Consumption
• Webster’s: The act of buying luxury goods to publicly display wealth or status rather than for necessity.
• Urban: When people buy expensive stuff they don’t need just to flex, even when they broke.
Meanwhile, they subdued people with semi-legal marijuana, flipping it into a membership-based model through medical exceptions.
Positional Good
• Webster’s: A product or service whose value is derived from its exclusivity and limited availability.
• Urban: When something is only cool because not everyone can have it.
It got to the point where people were willing to cheat the system to help the system, normalizing fraud while reinforcing dependencies they control.
And while people were distracted, they were quietly redistributing resources and policy power behind the scenes.
Redistribution of Resources
• Webster’s: The reallocation of economic or policy resources, often shifting benefits from one group to another.
• Urban: When they take money from one pot and slide it to their boys while you’re busy looking the other way.
This is how policy manipulation works. Fear-based narratives—whether about crime, immigration, economic collapse, or public health—are used to manufacture a policy window that allows for changes people wouldn’t normally accept.
As my paper explains (I wrote this long-winded paper in grad school my first semester),
“The political stream is formed through negotiating rather than persuasion… a mixture of the political climate, vocalism of interest groups, negotiating terms of support amongst politicians, and compromising proposed solutions make up the political stream.”
These changes don’t happen randomly. They happen when the public’s focus is steered away from the real game being played.
Policy Stream
• Webster’s: The process where potential solutions to problems are debated, modified, and prepared for implementation.
• Urban: The part where they throw a bunch of ideas at the wall and see which one benefits their donors the most.
At some point, we have to ask:
• Are we shaping policy, or are we being shaped by it?
• Are we demanding real solutions, or just reacting to the latest fear cycle?
The way out of this cycle starts with awareness. It’s time to stop falling for the same distractions and start paying attention to what’s really being moved behind the scenes.
Final Thought
• Webster’s: Be an informed citizen and question the motivations behind major policy shifts.
• Urban: Stay woke. They running the same playbook on you again.
Stay sharp. Stay informed. Don’t let them play you.
Comments